Difference between revisions of "User:Kebap/translation infrastructure"

Revision as of 19:19, 4 June 2018

History:

https://github.com/Mudlet/Mudlet/issues/856 - Setup a web-based translation service for Mudlet
https://github.com/Mudlet/Mudlet/issues/1664 - Translation infrastructure of Mudlet web-presences

Main sources of text:

Processes for each:

Find out a way to tell outdated texts from relevant current texts which need translation.
Get texts out of sources (see above). Can this be automated with any tool? Who should be responsible?
Get texts in to translation tool.
Translating inside tool (ok this is to be expected, but also needs good interface and workflows)
Translators report confusing strings back to Mudlet team with information how they need to be adjusted.
Mudlet team updates text in source. Either because of reports, or because of natural evolution.
Updated texts from source need updates in translation tool. Export and import again, plus diff.
Translated texts will be finished. Export them from translation tool. Automation again?
Import translated text to source.
Display of translations in source. Here we will need some sort of language toggle switch in each source.

References:

Another great in-depth look at several alternatives and the process in general in this master study thesis about “Translations in libre software”: https://larjona.wordpress.com/translations-in-libre-software/
multilingual plugins for Wordpress: https://wordpress.org/plugins/search/multilingual
- Polylang: https://wordpress.org/plugins/polylang/
Wordpress internationalisation workflow
- http://www.cardinalpath.com/multilingual-wordpress-international-seo/
integration to Crowdin
- Mediawiki
- Github

Decisions:

we should be using US English in the source. Sometimes it is still en/GB - e.g. "licence/license", "color/colour", etc.
when a language offers multiple choices on how to address the reader, we will choose the less formal, more friendly way

Revision as of 01:27, 4 June 2018 (view source) Kebap (talk \| contribs) m ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:19, 4 June 2018 (view source) Kebap (talk \| contribs) m Newer edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:

	* we should be using US English in the source. Sometimes it is still en/GB - e.g. "licence/license", "color/colour", etc.		* we should be using US English in the source. Sometimes it is still en/GB - e.g. "licence/license", "color/colour", etc.
		+	* when a language offers multiple choices on how to address the reader, we will choose the less formal, more friendly way